i Alatab S, Sepanlou SG, Ikuta K, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020;5(1):17-30. doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30333-4
iiDai C, Huang YH, Jiang M. Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and perspectives. International Immunopharmacology. 2023;114:109545. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109545
iiiColombel JF, D’haens G, Lee WJ, Petersson J, Panaccione R. Outcomes and Strategies to Support a Treat-to-target Approach in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14(2):254-266. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz131
ivMolander P, Sipponen T, Kemppainen H, et al. Achievement of deep remission during scheduled maintenance therapy with TNFα-blocking agents in IBD. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2013;7(9):730-735. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.10.018
vRoda G, Jharap B, Neeraj N, Colombel JF. Loss of Response to Anti-TNFs: Definition, Epidemiology, and Management. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7(1):e135. Published 2016 Jan 7. doi:10.1038/ctg.2015.63
viNeurath MF. Current and emerging therapeutic targets for IBD [published correction appears in Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;14(11):688. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.138]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(5):269-278. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.208
viiVavricka SR, Schoepfer A, Scharl M, Lakatos PL, Navarini A, Rogler G. Extraintestinal Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(8):1982-1992. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000392
viiiClick B, Lopez R, Arrigain S, Schold J, Regueiro M, Rizk M. Shifting Cost-drivers of Health Care Expenditures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2019;26(8):1268-1275. doi:10.1093/ibd/izz256
ixSingh S, Qian AS, Nguyen NH, et al. Trends in U.S. Health Care Spending on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 1996-2016. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022;28(3):364-372. doi:10.1093/ibd/izab074
xBerinstein EM, Sheehan JL, Jacob J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Dual Targeted Therapy for Partially or Non-responsive Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature [published correction appears in Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4540. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08130-w]. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68(6):2604-2623. doi:10.1007/s10620-023-07837-0
Dual Approaches, Added Challenges: Complexities of Combination Therapy Trials in IBD Part 1
By Kremena Stoyanova
Senior Director, Medical Monitoring & Consulting
Introduction: Raising the Therapeutic Ceiling in IBD Treatment
Treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the family of chronic gastrointestinal disorders that includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and dramatically impacts the lives of approximately 7 million patients around the world, is at a crossroads.i
In recent decades, the advent of biological agents, particularly anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α agents such as infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab, has transformed the standard of treatment for these diseases, shifting the therapeutic strategy from controlling symptoms to a treat-to-target strategy aimed at durable remission and prevention of damage progression and disability.ii,iii But while effective in achieving remission in more than half of IBD patients, significant unmet needs remain.iv
In addition to the high cost of these treatments, anti-TNF-α agents are prone to secondary loss-of-response over time due to factors such as development of anti-drug antibodies, loss of drug in the stool, or mechanism escape.ii,v 30 to 50 percent of patients with IBD either fail to respond to anti-TNF therapy or see decreased efficacy over time.vi IBD is also frequently associated with extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), including arthritis, uveitis, erythema nodosum, and primary sclerosing cholangitis, further complicating the effective management of the disease.vii
For many refractory IBD patients, surgery remains an all too likely possibility. Living with this prospect only heightens the disease’s well-documented patient burden, which ranges from the immediate impact on the patient’s physical well-being to time lost due to illness and recurring hospital visits.viii In addition, IBD carries a significant financial burden for both patients and national healthcare systems, and one that continues to grow. For instance, annual U.S. healthcare spending on IBD increased from $6.4 billion to $25.4 billion between 1996 and 2016.ix
A potential solution has emerged in the form of combination therapies. These currently fall into two general groups:ii
It’s believed these therapies may be able to achieve greater outcomes through additive or synergistic effects, or by acting on different inflammatory pathways in the case of DTTs, representing an opportunity to overcome the “ceiling effect” of biologic and advanced monotherapies.ii In addition, they may represent an effective strategy for refractory IBD patients or those with EIMs. However, there are still many unanswered questions about this new avenue, as well as obstacles to future research.
Overcoming these obstacles starts with a clear understanding of the current treatment landscape and operational considerations. In this series, we will review the state of development of combination therapies in IBD today and primary considerations for future research, including:
Read the next part in the series or skip ahead below:
Part 2: A Brief History of Combination Therapies in IBD
Part 3: Challenges in IBD Combination Therapy Research
Part 4: Overcoming Obstacles in Combination Therapy Research
i Alatab S, Sepanlou SG, Ikuta K, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020;5(1):17-30. doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30333-4
iiDai C, Huang YH, Jiang M. Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and perspectives. International Immunopharmacology. 2023;114:109545. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109545
iiiColombel JF, D’haens G, Lee WJ, Petersson J, Panaccione R. Outcomes and Strategies to Support a Treat-to-target Approach in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14(2):254-266. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz131
ivMolander P, Sipponen T, Kemppainen H, et al. Achievement of deep remission during scheduled maintenance therapy with TNFα-blocking agents in IBD. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2013;7(9):730-735. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.10.018
vRoda G, Jharap B, Neeraj N, Colombel JF. Loss of Response to Anti-TNFs: Definition, Epidemiology, and Management. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7(1):e135. Published 2016 Jan 7. doi:10.1038/ctg.2015.63
viNeurath MF. Current and emerging therapeutic targets for IBD [published correction appears in Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;14(11):688. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.138]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(5):269-278. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.208
viiVavricka SR, Schoepfer A, Scharl M, Lakatos PL, Navarini A, Rogler G. Extraintestinal Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(8):1982-1992. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000392
viiiClick B, Lopez R, Arrigain S, Schold J, Regueiro M, Rizk M. Shifting Cost-drivers of Health Care Expenditures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2019;26(8):1268-1275. doi:10.1093/ibd/izz256
ixSingh S, Qian AS, Nguyen NH, et al. Trends in U.S. Health Care Spending on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 1996-2016. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022;28(3):364-372. doi:10.1093/ibd/izab074
xBerinstein EM, Sheehan JL, Jacob J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Dual Targeted Therapy for Partially or Non-responsive Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature [published correction appears in Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4540. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08130-w]. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68(6):2604-2623. doi:10.1007/s10620-023-07837-0
Share